Wisconsin Republican Recall Election
That time will be here before
we know it. First the Democratic Primary in May, where Tom Barrett again will
decide if he wants to be the Wisconsin Governor or Milwaukee Mayor. Then there
is the recall election in June, where who knows what will happen. And if the
Unions have their way, Governor Scott Walker will become only the third
Governor to be recalled in the United States – but they’re also going for the
Lt. Gov. and four State Senators as well. I don’t want to think of that.
But this is not about
Governor Walker; it is about Labor Unions taking back the political power in
Wisconsin through the Democratic Party, and in case you haven’t noticed “when
Labor speaks, Democrats listen”. Their only purpose is to return to their cherade of "collective bargaining".
So, this is then really a rouse by the Democrats to take over the state of Wisconsin in one “fell swoop”. I personally have not voted for a Democrat, and while I have respect for Trade Unions in maintaining a quality of craftsmanship among their members, I do not expect nor do I want those unions to run the politics of our State or our Country.
Here is a lengthy account of recall history in Wisconsin. This was not the process intended. At the time (1926), only State senators had more than two year terms - the intention was to make senators accountable to the electorate and not to special interests. The four year terms were not enacted until 1967. Today, we also have a plethora of partisan (elected as non- partisan) judges messing with laws. Why are there no recalls taking place with them?
So, this is then really a rouse by the Democrats to take over the state of Wisconsin in one “fell swoop”. I personally have not voted for a Democrat, and while I have respect for Trade Unions in maintaining a quality of craftsmanship among their members, I do not expect nor do I want those unions to run the politics of our State or our Country.
Here is a lengthy account of recall history in Wisconsin. This was not the process intended. At the time (1926), only State senators had more than two year terms - the intention was to make senators accountable to the electorate and not to special interests. The four year terms were not enacted until 1967. Today, we also have a plethora of partisan (elected as non-
Think about this: once the
recall election is completed, the results are final for the remainder of those
terms involved in the recall. It’s not the electorate deciding on one candidate
or another – it is an attempt to remove a party from their majority. All for
the sake of Union proclaimed rights. An alternative to a recall election would
have been a referendum to determine if a recall is warranted.
I have faith in the Wisconsin
electorate to see through the misinformation and the bullying going on in
Madison and Milwaukee. While the Democrats claim nearly 1,000,000 recall
signatures, it is more like 860,155 unique signatures, which include 63,038
ineligible signatures and 212,628 signatures for further investigation. This is
according to “True the Vote” summary (3/21/2012) for the Walker recall
petitions. While the GAB has already certified the petition signatures – the
unique signatures amount to about 40% of the electorate, including the questionable signatures; to
27% excluding the questionable signatures – this is based on the TTV summary
and the 11/2010 voter turnout. I’ll go with these odds.
And then there is the cost
administering and conducting the statewide recall election – a total of
$9,011,762.18 estimate according to
David Kennedy, Director and General Counsel for the GAB. Who pays that? The
Wisconsin taxpayer! I think that expense should be sent to the Democratic
Party.
Comments
Post a Comment